<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Football English</title>
	<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/</link>
	<description>Scattered values and the chance of philosophy. May contain funny.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3250</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 10:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3250</guid>
					<description>Know the feeling. I clam up at: &quot;I love you way you guys talk&quot;.

Or when someone links to your blog and says: &quot;He's brilliant! Look at what he says!&quot;

Apparently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Know the feeling. I clam up at: &#8220;I love you way you guys talk&#8221;.</p>
<p>Or when someone links to your blog and says: &#8220;He&#8217;s brilliant! Look at what he says!&#8221;</p>
<p>Apparently.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sooz</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3249</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 09:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3249</guid>
					<description>No can do.  I've now got stage fright!  Everyone will be looking at this and saying 'well that's not witty' so the moment has gone. It's tant amount to being drunk and thinking you're so very funny.  The next day you wish you hadn't been quite so err 'comical'!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No can do.  I&#8217;ve now got stage fright!  Everyone will be looking at this and saying &#8216;well that&#8217;s not witty&#8217; so the moment has gone. It&#8217;s tant amount to being drunk and thinking you&#8217;re so very funny.  The next day you wish you hadn&#8217;t been quite so err &#8216;comical&#8217;!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3220</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3220</guid>
					<description>Weird. Probably because I changed the title of the post of something.

hmm - Can you reply wittily here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird. Probably because I changed the title of the post of something.</p>
<p>hmm - Can you reply wittily here?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sooz</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3210</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3210</guid>
					<description>Cliff - there seems to be something wrong with the comments thingy on the next post - it says 'page not found' and I wanted to reply wittily!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff - there seems to be something wrong with the comments thingy on the next post - it says &#8216;page not found&#8217; and I wanted to reply wittily!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3158</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3158</guid>
					<description>Cheers Mike. See, a lesser man might correct his mistakes and delete all these comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Mike. See, a lesser man might correct his mistakes and delete all these comments.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3157</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3157</guid>
					<description>Also - and I hate to kick a man while he's down, but -  the past tense of &quot;have&quot; is &quot;had&quot;, not &quot;has&quot;.  &quot;Has&quot; was correctly being used as part of a present perfect construction, as in: &quot;he has made a challenge&quot;.

http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentperfect.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also - and I hate to kick a man while he&#8217;s down, but -  the past tense of &#8220;have&#8221; is &#8220;had&#8221;, not &#8220;has&#8221;.  &#8220;Has&#8221; was correctly being used as part of a present perfect construction, as in: &#8220;he has made a challenge&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentperfect.html' rel='nofollow'>http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/presentperfect.html</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3156</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3156</guid>
					<description>Gordon - That's hypothetical. James Beatty doesn't have a little look or take the bal around defenders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon - That&#8217;s hypothetical. James Beatty doesn&#8217;t have a little look or take the bal around defenders.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3155</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3155</guid>
					<description>Shit * - I think you're right.

How about &quot;he've&quot; and &quot;she've&quot;

Bugger. Now I'm angry and wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shit * - I think you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>How about &#8220;he&#8217;ve&#8221; and &#8220;she&#8217;ve&#8221;</p>
<p>Bugger. Now I&#8217;m angry and wrong.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3154</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3154</guid>
					<description>He has had a little look.
He's had a little look.

The English language is built on flexibility, this is one such example surely. Such things evolve, for good or bad.

Would it have been different if the commentator had been talking about James Beattie?? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has had a little look.<br />
He&#8217;s had a little look.</p>
<p>The English language is built on flexibility, this is one such example surely. Such things evolve, for good or bad.</p>
<p>Would it have been different if the commentator had been talking about James Beattie?? <img src='http://www.thisisthis.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: * (asterisk)</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3153</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3153</guid>
					<description>I'm not convinced by this argument. I think the verb &quot;to have&quot; may be contracted in all its forms:

I've
You've
He's
We've
You've 
They've.

Surely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not convinced by this argument. I think the verb &#8220;to have&#8221; may be contracted in all its forms:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve<br />
You&#8217;ve<br />
He&#8217;s<br />
We&#8217;ve<br />
You&#8217;ve<br />
They&#8217;ve.</p>
<p>Surely?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Salvadore Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3150</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3150</guid>
					<description>Lynne Truss thinks he's right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynne Truss thinks he&#8217;s right.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed R</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3148</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/11/30/football-english/#comment-3148</guid>
					<description>So CLiffs, what's the proper contraction for He has? I was thinking &quot;he's&quot; is valid in that usage.
But then again, I never studied words or their usage much beyond 'The Bridge over San Luis Rey'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So CLiffs, what&#8217;s the proper contraction for He has? I was thinking &#8220;he&#8217;s&#8221; is valid in that usage.<br />
But then again, I never studied words or their usage much beyond &#8216;The Bridge over San Luis Rey&#8217;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
