<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Music Works</title>
	<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/</link>
	<description>Scattered values and the chance of philosophy. May contain funny.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: * (asterisk)</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3411</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3411</guid>
					<description>Is that me, Ed R?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that me, Ed R?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed R</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3379</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3379</guid>
					<description>Oh great, there's punctuation that's got more interpretive intuition than I do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh great, there&#8217;s punctuation that&#8217;s got more interpretive intuition than I do!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: * (asterisk)</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3361</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3361</guid>
					<description>Cliff, I'm afraid I didn't catch all five. Now I feel like a numbskull for even having brought up the subject. Grrr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff, I&#8217;m afraid I didn&#8217;t catch all five. Now I feel like a numbskull for even having brought up the subject. Grrr.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ed R</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3332</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3332</guid>
					<description>Levels? THere's more than one 'level' to this post? Someone clue me in. Does Dirty Harry count as a level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Levels? THere&#8217;s more than one &#8216;level&#8217; to this post? Someone clue me in. Does Dirty Harry count as a level?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3329</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3329</guid>
					<description>Loved the show, thanks for the recommendation. I don't qualify as a music snob yet, since I had to record How Music Works because it clashed with the X Factor restults - complete with blatant use of key change/performer standing up and walking towards audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the show, thanks for the recommendation. I don&#8217;t qualify as a music snob yet, since I had to record How Music Works because it clashed with the X Factor restults - complete with blatant use of key change/performer standing up and walking towards audience.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3327</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3327</guid>
					<description>* - There are actually five levels to this post. Did you spot them all?

Mike - The programme is astounding. Many a holy crap moment. Like the chords at the beginning of Purple Haze that you never thought about. Or sustained chords, or the syncopation in Stevie Wonder's voice.

Felix Mendelssohn said: &quot;It is not that music is too imprecise for words, but too precise.&quot; This show comes very close to doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* - There are actually five levels to this post. Did you spot them all?</p>
<p>Mike - The programme is astounding. Many a holy crap moment. Like the chords at the beginning of Purple Haze that you never thought about. Or sustained chords, or the syncopation in Stevie Wonder&#8217;s voice.</p>
<p>Felix Mendelssohn said: &#8220;It is not that music is too imprecise for words, but too precise.&#8221; This show comes very close to doing it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3326</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3326</guid>
					<description>We're a couple of weeks behind, so we only watched the programme on rhythm last night.  To be honest, I think it has already altered the way I listen to music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re a couple of weeks behind, so we only watched the programme on rhythm last night.  To be honest, I think it has already altered the way I listen to music.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: * (asterisk)</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3325</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 09:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thisisthis.org/2006/12/05/how-music-works/#comment-3325</guid>
					<description>Of course, I'm a stickler for apostrophes, and I also like music, so this post worked on so many levels for me. I even like the missing &quot;to&quot; in the fourth para, which you must've omitted to trick us. You, sir, are a wag and a scoundrel.

And no, I can't imagine music without minor chords. In the same way that I can't imagine music without a key change where the performer suddenly has to stand up and walk towards the audience. That is to say, I think both are overused in an attempt to evoke an emotional response that would otherwise be fruitless due to the inane nature of what passes for music (and, more importantly, lyrical content) these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I&#8217;m a stickler for apostrophes, and I also like music, so this post worked on so many levels for me. I even like the missing &#8220;to&#8221; in the fourth para, which you must&#8217;ve omitted to trick us. You, sir, are a wag and a scoundrel.</p>
<p>And no, I can&#8217;t imagine music without minor chords. In the same way that I can&#8217;t imagine music without a key change where the performer suddenly has to stand up and walk towards the audience. That is to say, I think both are overused in an attempt to evoke an emotional response that would otherwise be fruitless due to the inane nature of what passes for music (and, more importantly, lyrical content) these days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
