Let’s Get Physical
I’m not a hugger. Trees, metaphorically, but not folks generally.
So it comes as some surprise to me that I dispensed such two public displays of affection in the office in as many weeks. And they were both girls! Yuh-huh.
One was to a friend who has been very supportive over the last few weeks while we went through a reshuffle and we were both relieved to keep our jobs. She’s a rock and I’d been in between her and a hard place. Oh fuck off.
The other was to someone who actually lost their job who has been working for my employer for ten years.
The good thing about being a selective hugger is that it means more when you put out.
The bad thing about being a selective hugger is that is means more when you put out.
So if you’re not careful, the huggee can think two things in the heat of the moment.
Either: “Woah, coffee and cold shower for Table Me, please.”
Or: “Ummm…. OK, this is wierd. And, we’re still hugging…”
I am fully aware of this, which is why I am very careful. I’m probably a little too aware with my personal space, but if no one was, we would all be Italian. Yes, the food would be great, but who would fight all the wars?
—-
Reading this back, I realised I wrote: “One was to a friend”
A “hug to” instead of “with” or just, um, ”hug” is a telling turn of phrase, I guess. I’m leaving it in, though, because that’s me.
Morning.
February 19th, 2007 at 12:26 pm
Was it a back-slapping type of hug? They are OK, as long as you both keep talking whilst it happens.
Silent, motionless, head-tilted-to-theirs hugs are the ones to worry about.
February 19th, 2007 at 10:42 pm
The ones to REALLY worry about are the ones when you smell their hair, no?
February 19th, 2007 at 11:33 pm
I find a tap on the back makes a hug just friendly, as opposed to just holding the other person and resting your chin on their shoulder.
February 20th, 2007 at 1:07 pm
and whatever you do Cliff, don’t do the bear hug one where you squeeze them tight and lift them bodily from the floor. *that*’s a step too far for an occasional hugger, i’d say, particularly in the circumstances you’ve described.