Comments on: My Old Man’s And Dustmen http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/ Scattered values and the chance of philosophy. May contain funny. Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:22:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 by: ed r http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79542 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:28:31 +0000 http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79542 See me? See the look on my face? Confusion. See 'Death at a Funeral' and laugh. See me? See the look on my face? Confusion.
See ‘Death at a Funeral’ and laugh.

]]> by: Jonners http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79496 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:09:59 +0000 http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79496 Cliff, I see the apple has not fallen far from the tree. Or the tree hasn't moved a lot since the apple fell. Nice to see (read). Cliff, I see the apple has not fallen far from the tree. Or the tree hasn’t moved a lot since the apple fell. Nice to see (read).

]]> by: Wendy http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79472 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:00:47 +0000 http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79472 It looks for the offending words in the url rather than in the content, I think. Thank fuck. Interesting that you mention that 2 of your readers are on a completely different contintental. Nice of you to throw that one in. Anyway, stop being such a crosspatch, um, work. Which that clearly didn't. It looks for the offending words in the url rather than in the content, I think. Thank fuck.

Interesting that you mention that 2 of your readers are on a completely different contintental. Nice of you to throw that one in. Anyway, stop being such a crosspatch, um, work. Which that clearly didn’t.

]]> by: Cliff http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79464 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:33:13 +0000 http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79464 Wendy - and yet you can type "sexy". Interesting. No, I mean Kate Blankett. Quilt correcting everything I write. Do you think the readers give a sheet? Duvet? Wendy - and yet you can type “sexy”. Interesting.

No, I mean Kate Blankett. Quilt correcting everything I write. Do you think the readers give a sheet? Duvet?

]]> by: Wendy http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79453 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:58:44 +0000 http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79453 Also, who is Kate Blankett? Do you mean Cate Blanchett? Blanchett on the ground? Also, who is Kate Blankett?

Do you mean Cate Blanchett?

Blanchett on the ground?

]]> by: Wendy http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79452 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:37:22 +0000 http://www.thisisthis.org/2008/02/27/my-old-mans-and-dustmen/#comment-79452 I'm somewhat handicapped commentswise today in a fashion that will only last another 3 weeks or so. YES. I can't comment on the sexy post because it has "sexy" in the title which is filtered, so I can't get to it. ARGH. Anyway, I merely wished to point out that I think some people can fall into both categories - Winslet and Depp in particular. Depp is DEFINTELY in-your-face sexy. In my face, anyway. Also - for the love of baby jesus - I can't read RW and WM because blogspot is ALSO filtered. Happy days. I’m somewhat handicapped commentswise today in a fashion that will only last another 3 weeks or so. YES.

I can’t comment on the sexy post because it has “sexy” in the title which is filtered, so I can’t get to it. ARGH. Anyway, I merely wished to point out that I think some people can fall into both categories - Winslet and Depp in particular. Depp is DEFINTELY in-your-face sexy.

In my face, anyway.

Also - for the love of baby jesus - I can’t read RW and WM because blogspot is ALSO filtered. Happy days.

]]>