Search And High Definition
I get a few searches on this site, and yesterday, despite not writing anything, I got about forty searches, all from Australia asking how many ADHD sufferers it takes to change a lightbulb. If there is anyone reading this in Australia, can you please tell me why this entered the national consciousness on Monday?
There were loads of them. Unless it is the same person who actually has ADHD and seriously wants to know how to change a lightbulb but is compelled to typing it into google over and over again. I can see that.
Normally the most common search I get (apart from the porn ones) is for songs about rivers. I like that, and also I’m surprised no one has written about it more.
With the porn searches, right, I’d have to ask: why do they stay? Sure, be referred here by looking for whatever but then why then spend 17 minutes and view seven separate pages? Do they not believe that there is no porn here or do they change their minds and stick around for a laugh and listen to a couple of songs?
I don’t get it.
So I was saying on Friday I got a HD receiver at the weekend. I’ve had an High Definition television for about five years and I’ve never done anything with it, but now I’ve got the stuff to go with it, and I can confirm that it is the shit.
And there are hundreds of channels. I can watch The Dog Whisperer all day long. It’s on Animal Planet, then later it’s on The Dog Channel, and right after that it’s on The Whispering Channel. Tomorrow on TWC it’s Bob Harris Night. I’ve watched stuff about US civil war.
The stuff in HD looks amazing. Now I want the all the CCTV and police cars to have high definition cameras in them so I can watch really clear pictures on those real-life crime shows.
I watched this one thing about the Forbidden City and it was awesome. Watching reality TV in high-def is like looking out the window without all that hassle and expense that comes with looking out an actual window. I’ve been watching shows that aren’t even that interesting but they are in HD. It’s like listening to crap music because it sounds good.
Speaking of listening, the podcast thing is once again put back a week. Mr Angry got in touch yesterday to say that the night we were supposed to tape (haha, I said tape) the entertainment (Haha! I said entertainment) is the night of the England football (HAHA!!!) match, which I didn’t realise when I suggested the time. I did an Arty Fufkin-esque “I got no timing, I fucked up the timing”.
Actually, that’s a funny thing, because only fans on Spinal Tap will get that, but I throw it out there just like that. The other week I was in Broadcasting House for a conference and we were trying to find the Radio Theatre, which is a beautiful 1930’s room where they record I’m Sorry I Haven’t A Clue and lots more your ears could care to mention.
BH is an old building on a corner of a street and it has round corridors and alleys which seem inspired by the runs that rabbits weave in the brush. Some colleague and I were looking for the studio and we reached a dead end. A cleaner appeared and we asked the right way and she sent us back with a series of complicated instruction involving fire doors and stairways. We turned around and headed for the venue, I said “Hello Cleveland!” and the air went so dead you could smell it.
If this isn’t funny to you now, then I am recounting something that wasn’t funny then, but I thought I’d give it another go.
So we’re going to move the podcast back a week (again), recording in the middle of next week. We’ll leave it to cool on the window ledge a couple of days and you should have it by next weekend. See now with all this talk of movies, I’m thinking of American Pie and that’s just wrong.
Hopefully this slapdash and ramshackle approach to planning is what makes me and Mr Angry funny people in the first place. It’s what the French call a lezzy fair, and hopefully we can redeem ourselves in exchange for LOLs sometime next week.
October 14th, 2008 at 10:16 am
Okay I’ll bite how many people with ADHD does it take to change a lightbulb?
On the subject of searching for porn what sort of search criteria are people entering that bring them to your site? I’m asking from a purely academic point of view of course.
I’m told by others more worldly than I that porn is very easy to find on the internet but I wouldn’t know about that.
October 14th, 2008 at 10:22 am
Seriously, this thing has more plugs than a B&Q showroom and I’m starting to feel the pressure…
Anyway, it’s taken me almost two years to come up with this one…
How many Americans does it take to change a lightbulb?
It depends, does this lightbulb have any oil reserves?
(P.S. Sky+ HD, other another brand?)
October 14th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Keef - the answer is “LET’S RIDE BIKES!!!!”
Also http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=download%20mobile%20porn&start=20&sa=N
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GFRC_enUS205US205&q=wife%20picture%20blog
http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=nigella%20lawson%20facelift&meta=
http://www.google.fr/search?gbv=2&hl=fr&safe=off&q=MY%20WIFE%20PICS&start=20&sa=N
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=where%20can%20i%20download%20porn%20for%20my%20phone&spell=1
I don’t know what I’m doing with my google ranking, but it must be something right, because that last one if very popular, and I seem to be an authority on it.
Angry - Very nice. We can put that in the show. Nobody reads these comments.
It’s Sky + HD. Like an egomaniac I wasn’t mentioning the brand because I didn’t want them to get free adverts. But I’ll happily keep talking about the podcast for days on end.
October 14th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Another week? That’s ruined my schedule.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Fascinating stuff there Cliff though I do wonder about the guys searching for pictures of (presumably) their wives.
If they wanted pictures of their wives why don’t they just ask her to smile for the camera?
October 14th, 2008 at 8:13 pm
Keef - I suspect it isn’t pictures of their own wives they are looking for.
October 14th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
CHaos, destruction, and ruined schedules. My work here is done.
October 14th, 2008 at 9:52 pm
Really Len G, that’s possible I suppose but don’t you think in that case it should be more specific?
Perhaps they should enter a search term like ‘The fit blonde that’s married to the plumber at No 57 just up the street’
I mean I know that Google uses some very sophiscated logic but working out who you want pictures of from something as basic as Wife Picture takes some really skillful programming.
October 15th, 2008 at 11:19 pm
Can you tell me how they think that they can do HD justice when they’re advertising it on normal TV? Same as advertising DVD quality on VHS - if you can show it then you can do it and if you can do it then you don’t need to change it.
October 16th, 2008 at 8:45 am
My head…
October 20th, 2008 at 4:23 am
The searches are because in a Sydney newpaper it was a crossword clue.
And yes, I am one of the people searching it.
October 20th, 2008 at 8:38 am
Thanks very much Abigail, I did wonder - welcome you and Princess too.